What are the problems associated with old-fashioned scale software?
Traditional weighing systems were once sufficient for basic on-site operations, but they no longer meet modern business requirements. The previous way of using scale software and managing weighing data is outdated, fragmented, and inefficient.
/New_07_2023/ERP_old_weighing.jpg?width=416&height=354&name=ERP_old_weighing.jpg)
Short-lived peripheral devices
Old-fashioned setups depend heavily on physical devices such as printers, receipt printers, and RFID readers that require frequent maintenance or replacement. These short-life components increase operating costs and maintenance efforts. With modern digital weighing systems like mScales, these devices will no longer be necessary since data is stored, shared, and processed automatically within the cloud-based service.
Scale-specific and outdated technology
Old-fashioned scale software typically relies on scale-specific Windows-based applications and dedicated hardware. These systems require frequent maintenance and manual updates, making them vulnerable to compatibility and security issues. Their local installation also limits flexibility and scalability, especially when multiple weighing locations are in use.
Siloed operations
In traditional setups, each weighing site operates independently with its own data and procedures. Information is stored locally and not automatically shared between locations. This siloed structure makes it difficult to gain a complete overview of operations or manage weighing data across different facilities.
Fragmented data management
Weighing results are often stored separately from business systems such as sales and purchase orders. This fragmentation prevents seamless data flow between weighing, inventory, and order management, leading to manual data entry, duplication of work, and potential errors.
Labor-intensive use
Old systems are designed for local field personnel, requiring operators to manage weighing tasks and data handling manually. Remote monitoring or automated workflows are rarely supported, which increases the workload and limits operational efficiency.